GHT: Glass House Technologies
GHT service / Networks and wireless

Outdoor wireless links

Bridging sites where a wired path is impractical

Outdoor wireless extends network service to remote buildings, cameras, gates, and equipment.

What you should have at closeoutA weather-ready radio link with a path profile, link budget, alignment and performance baseline, endpoint records, and a maintenance plan.
References3 reviewed
Last updated2026-08-20
Overview

What Outdoor wireless links includes

A fixed wireless link depends on more than visual line of sight. Frequency, path length, Fresnel-zone clearance, terrain, foliage, structures, interference, antenna gain, mounting stability and legal operating limits affect the link budget.

The radio system also depends on cable entry, surge and bonding coordination, local power, network segmentation, enclosure/environment ratings, safe access and a recovery method if alignment or hardware fails.

Question to answer before designIs the path clear through all seasons, and can both endpoints be safely mounted, powered, protected, and serviced?
Common situations

This service may fit when:

  • A remote building or yard lacks a practical wired route
  • Temporary construction or event connectivity is needed
  • Outdoor cameras, gates or operational devices need coverage
  • An existing bridge is unstable during weather or seasonal growth
System components

What the system includes

A complete scope covers each part below and the connections between them.

01

Network endpoint A

Switching, power, policy and physical cable entry

02

Radio path

Frequency, distance, Fresnel clearance and interference environment

03

Network endpoint B

Mount, radio, enclosure and local distribution

04

Service/fallback

Applications carried, monitoring, spares and alternate access

Project record

How site information becomes a tested project

A complete project record connects the conditions found on site, the design decisions made from them, and the tests and closeout documents delivered afterward.

Site information

What we confirm before design

  • Endpoint coordinates, heights and path distance
  • Terrain, foliage, structures and seasonal obstruction
  • Capacity, latency and application requirements
Design decisions

What those findings determine

  • Topology: Use endpoint count, capacity sharing and failure consequence.
  • Spectrum: Compare interference tolerance, capacity, cost and authorization.
  • Mounting: Use path height, loading, safe access and structural review.
Closeout records

What you should receive

  • Path profile and RF link budget
  • Endpoint/mounting and cable-entry plan
  • Frequency/configuration and network-policy record

The exact inputs, decisions, and acceptance records depend on the site and signed scope.

Project stagesSurvey through closeoutView details
Project stages

How the work moves from survey to closeout

Each stage should produce the records and test results needed before the next stage begins.

  1. 01

    Path study

    Confirm coordinates, elevations, obstructions, Fresnel clearance, spectrum and access at both ends.

    EvidencePath profile, site photos and feasibility/risk record
  2. 02

    Link and site design

    Calculate the link, select radios/antennas, mounts, power, cable entry and network policy.

    EvidenceLink budget, mounting details and endpoint schedule
  3. 03

    Install and align

    Mount securely, weatherproof transitions, coordinate bonding/surge work and align to planned levels.

    EvidenceInstallation photos, alignment values and configuration record
  4. 04

    Validate and baseline

    Measure signal, noise, modulation, throughput and application behavior under agreed conditions.

    EvidenceLink-health baseline, performance results and maintenance runbook
Design choicesCompare the available approachesView details
Options

How to choose the right approach

The right choice depends on the site, application, operating risk, and acceptance requirements. More equipment does not automatically improve the system.

FactorTypical approachMore demanding conditionsWhat determines the choice
TopologyTypical approach: Point-to-point dedicated linkMore demanding conditions: Point-to-multipoint distributionWhat determines the choice: Use endpoint count, capacity sharing and failure consequence.
SpectrumTypical approach: Unlicensed operation under applicable limitsMore demanding conditions: Coordinated/licensed spectrum where available and justifiedWhat determines the choice: Compare interference tolerance, capacity, cost and authorization.
MountingTypical approach: Building mount with verified stability and clearanceMore demanding conditions: Pole/tower structure with engineered supportWhat determines the choice: Use path height, loading, safe access and structural review.
ResilienceTypical approach: Primary wireless link with spare hardwareMore demanding conditions: Diverse wired or cellular backupWhat determines the choice: Match recovery to outage consequence and repair access.
Before design

What we need to know

  • Endpoint coordinates, heights and path distance
  • Terrain, foliage, structures and seasonal obstruction
  • Capacity, latency and application requirements
  • Available spectrum and interference survey
  • Mounting, structural, power, grounding and safe-access conditions
At closeout

What you should receive

  • Path profile and RF link budget
  • Endpoint/mounting and cable-entry plan
  • Frequency/configuration and network-policy record
  • Alignment and performance baseline
  • As-built photos, inventory and maintenance/recovery runbook
Best fit

When this service makes sense

  • Building-to-building campus links
  • Warehouses, yards and exterior work areas
  • Remote cameras, gates and field assets
  • Temporary or staged connectivity with defined limitations
Before we commit

What we verify first

  • Fresnel obstruction, foliage and future construction
  • Spectrum rules and changing interference
  • Wind, water, temperature, lightning and mounting movement
  • Safe roof/tower access, power and service restoration time
Site contextSee where this work is usedView details
Where it is used

How site conditions change the design

Occupancy, operating hours, user activity, regulation, weather, construction, and access can change the design.

Common questions

What people usually ask

Is visible line of sight enough for a reliable link?

No. The path also needs adequate Fresnel-zone clearance, a viable link budget, stable mounts, manageable interference and compatible legal operating parameters.

Can outdoor Wi-Fi access points be used as a building bridge?

Some equipment supports bridge modes, but the link should still be designed from distance, antennas, path clearance, capacity, interference and mounting, not assumed from an outdoor rating.

What changes an outdoor link over time?

Foliage, new construction, mount movement, water ingress, cable or surge damage, interference, firmware/configuration and upstream power or network changes can all alter service.

Standards and referencesReview the source materialView details